|
See more of our on-line gear reviews in the Gear Section. Post questions and share your wisdom about guitars and gear in the Guitar Talk Forums. |
![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
AER ACOUSTICUBE IIA
|
$2,600, 120 watts, one eight-inch speaker and one tweeter, two channels, 28.7 pounds. The German-designed Acousticube incorporates just about every feature imaginable in a highly portable, 120-watt powerhouse. It sports two quarter-inch inputs on channel one (one of which is capable of delivering nine volts of phantom power), a clever combined quarter-inch/XLR input (capable of delivering 48 volts of phantom power) on channel two, and separate three-band EQ. The only type of input that would add to the package is a TRS for players who use stereo pickup setups, but one can be connected via a simple Y cable (the amp can also be special-ordered with a TRS input built in). The Acousticube’s back panel is more complicated than some amps’ front panels. It houses several different outputs (separate line outs for each channel as well as outputs for DI, tuner, headphones, stereo effects loop, etc.) along with their controls and switches. It also includes built-in, 32-bit digital effects, whose 100 presets are accessible by footswitch. The sound of the Acousticube defines the term transparent. All of the guitars we played through it were reproduced with extreme accuracy, and the amp highlighted each pickup system’s strengths and weaknesses. The voices of the Huipe and the Lowden came through with a complexity I’ve previously achieved only through a full-scale PA system. Some noticeable compression kicks in at higher volumes, but it is never unmusical and I suspect that this is the only way to keep the bass response from overpowering the small unit. The amp’s superlative performance can be further improved with an optional sub-bass box (Sub 10/250 P, $699), an active extension speaker designed to provide lower bass response and additional volume. Although $2,600 for an amp could cause serious sticker shock, the Acousticube is a professional tool that is bound to please connoisseurs of high-end guitars as well as gigging pros who need the ultimate in sound and portability.
|
|
|
FENDER ACOUSTASONIC JUNIOR
|
$579.99, 2 x 40 watts, two ten-inch speakers and one tweeter, two channels, 43 pounds. If you like the look of vintage electric amps, you’ll probably like Fender’s Acoustasonic Junior. If it wasn’t for the XLR input on channel two; the closed-back, solid-state design; and the brown tolex covering, the Acoustasonic could easily be mistaken for the classic Fender Deluxe Reverb. The vintage vibe is further enhanced by the cool, tilt-back legs, which allow for easy positioning as a stage monitor. Although it isn’t overly complicated, I found the layout of the front panel a bit impractical. There’s a master reverb control as well as a separate reverb control on the mic channel, but there’s only an on/off button controlling reverb on the instrument channel. This means that you have to use the master control for the instrument channel, which in effect changes the overall setting. Another similar drawback is the fact that there is no master volume control. In order to turn it up, you have to change the volume of each channel and try not to change the comparative levels. The complete lack of outputs (with the exception of an effects loop and insert) also limits the amp’s practicality for on-stage use. One way to get around this would be to use an external preamp or DI box with two outputs: one going to the PA and one to the amp. Despite these drawbacks, I found it easy to get a good sound out of the Junior. Especially with steel-string guitars, the amp produced a rich sound that would work for a variety of musical styles. The effective EQ allowed me to dial in satisfying tones on the fly, and the on-board chorus fattened the tone without sounding unnatural. The Junior would be a good choice for players who don’t need a lot of interfacing options and want a relatively portable, inexpensive amp with a range of good sounds. |
|
|
FENDER ACOUSTASONIC SFX
|
$899, 2 x 80 watts, one eight-inch speaker, one ten-inch speaker, one tweeter, two channels, 62 pounds. The gigantic Fender Acoustasonic SFX introduces some of the first truly new amplifier technology since solid-state circuitry took over in the late ’60s. Designed to simulate a stereo image without the need to spread out two separate speaker cabinets, the amp’s SFX (Stereo Field Expansion) technology takes advantage of a combination of electronic signal processing and an innovative array of speakers. The SFX uses an eight-inch speaker, a high-frequency horn in the traditional forward-facing position, and a ten-inch speaker in the bottom of the unit that faces sideways. The amp’s front panel features two rows of logically laid out controls, including the master reverb and master volume controls the Acoustasonic Junior lacks. But a lack of outputs seems to run in the family; the SFX has none. It does feature built-in digital effects with 32 presets (mostly variations on reverb, chorus, and delay), but instead of a standard effects loop, effects can only be patched into each individual channel via TRS insert jacks. The SFX sounds great, especially at higher volumes; this is an amp that wants to be cranked up. That makes it perfect for use in high-volume bands and other situations that require serious sound reinforcement. It took a while for us to dial in the right sound for each of the guitars we tested it with, but after some tweaking, the amp proved to be quite versatile due to its wide frequency spectrum. I’m not sure I would define the amp’s sound as stereo, but the SFX function does broaden the sound considerably, filling the room much more than what is normally possible with one cabinet. The Acoustasonic SFX would work for a variety of players, especially those who have strong arms or travel with roadies capable of lifting this 62-pound monster. |
|
|
IBANEZ TROUBADOR 25
|
$299, 25 watts, one ten-inch speaker and one tweeter, two channels, 22 pounds. Ibanez’ new Troubadour 25 is one of the least expensive acoustic amplifiers available. Although Ibanez isn’t known for acoustic guitar–related electronics, many of the company’s electronics products—particularly the TS-9 Tube Screamer—are held in high regard among electric players. Given the amp’s low cost, I was astonished by how well it performed. The amp’s semi-parametric midrange control helped to smooth out an initial harshness, and the Troubadour easily provided enough volume for a small solo gig or light reinforcement in a band situation. Both its reverb and chorus sounded a bit gritty, and the lack of an insert or effects loop means that external effects would have to be run in-line. There are also no outputs, which limits the amp’s usefulness in performance situations, but the bottom line is that the Troubadour is a bare-bones package that most anyone can afford. Acoustic players who were forced to compromise by using electric guitar amplification rigs in the past can now benefit from a system designed for acoustic guitars. So if your budget doesn’t allow you to spend more than three bills, I’d recommend giving the Troubadour a listen. |
|
|
SWR STRAWBERRY BLONDE
|
$699, 80 watts, one ten-inch speaker and one tweeter, one channel, 40 pounds. Following on the heels of SWR’s immensely successful California Blonde, this new amp from SWR should appeal to those who are looking for something smaller and less expensive. Featuring only one channel and input, this Blonde is clearly geared toward players who amplify their guitars with a single pickup, rather than those who need more inputs for mics or stereo pickup rigs. If you think that a basic front-panel layout means limited all-around features, think again. The Strawberry Blonde actually comes with a very complete set of features, including an effects loop, DI output, tuner output, and a mute button (which is very handy for quiet tuning or switching instruments). A clever fold-out handle on the bottom of the amp doubles as a sort of a kickstand to position the amp at a tilt, and the metal speaker grille adds to the unit’s roadworthiness. Playing our various guitars through the amp, we all agreed that the Strawberry Blonde has a nice, bright character appropriate in a loud band situation, but I found it difficult to get enough warmth out of the amp for solo fingerstyle work. I would have liked a variable control (instead of the on/off switch) for the amp’s high-frequency horn, which seemed to be a bit too up front in the mix and was also on the noisy side. Turning it all the way off resulted in a sound reminiscent of an electric guitar amp’s. While the SWR might not have the transparent qualities that some players look for in high-end acoustic amplification, it would be great for those who need a rugged, easy to set up, portable, powerful amp for on-stage use, particularly in high-volume band contexts. |
|
|
||
![]() |
Join the chat and get answers to your questions on-line at the Guitar Talk discussion forums. There are sections for chatting about gear and guitars (Gear), players and recordings (Players), and technique and theory (Playing Guitar). | |
![]() |
Learn about basic guitar maintenance and home repairs in the Acoustic Guitar Owner's Manual. | |
![]() |
Check out the latest in contempory custom lutherie in Custom
Guitars . This new tome includes more than 200 exquisite color plates of handmade instruments, as well as up-to-date biographies of the designers and builders. It covers the spectrum of instrument design and construction, including archtops, steel-string flattops, nylon-strings, resonators, Hawaiians, and specialty guitars. |
|
|
||||